Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.
--Daniel Patrick Moynihan

April 18, 2026

Instructions From the White House to the Cabinet

 

By David K. Shipler

 

            The Shipler Report has obtained an internal memo from Susie Wiles, President Trump’s chief of staff, announcing a significant exception to a standing order. The reversal pertains to statements on religion.

Previously, and in multiple reminders, Wiles had warned staff and Cabinet secretaries against upstaging the president. Now, she wants them to do just that. She is known as the most candid of Trump’s inner circle, hence her direct language.

On January 21, 2025, the day after Trump’s second inauguration, she wrote: “You must not publicize yourself, take credit for successful actions, or hint that major policy initiatives originated anywhere other than the President’s fertile imagination—otherwise known as his mind. You may not make public statements more outlandish than the President’s, or that provoke either more applause or more outrage than whatever the President has ignited. He is the Force, and no one of you must ever portray yourself as more inspiring, more energizing, or more appalling than him.”

            Then, in early March of this year, Wiles issued this terse message to the Cabinet: “Kristi Noem didn’t get the memo.” Days later, Noem was fired as Secretary of Homeland Security after spending $220 million on TV ads that featured herself, decked out in a cowboy hat, riding a horse in rugged terrain like a marshal come to bring order to a turbulent land.

            Last week, after Trump trash-talked Pope Leo XIV (“WEAK on crime and terrible for Foreign Policy,”) Wiles sent this urgent memo:

 

MEMORANDUM TO CABINET MEMBERS

            April 13, 2026

 

TO: CABINET SECRETARIES

FROM: SUSIE WILES, WHITE HOUSE CHIEF OF STAFF

SUBJECT: RELIGIOUS EXCEPTION TO MEMORANDA OF JAN. 21, 2025, MARCH 30, 2025, JULY 4, 2025, AND MARCH 3, 2026

 

            The White House, noting the President’s recent condemnation of the Holy Father, hereby reverses its previous order that staff and Cabinet Secretaries refrain from statements more excessive or inflammatory than the President’s. On the matter of religion, and on that topic only, Secretaries are instructed to fashion remarks that are actually more extreme, more outrageous, and more arrogant than the President’s. We acknowledge that this could present a challenge. But it is vital in maintaining the President’s (self-) image as a stable genius. Everything is relative, as we know. The Vice President, who cannot be commanded, much to the President’s dismay, is nevertheless encouraged to speak in this vein as well.

I.                    For example, it is recommended that the Vice President lecture the Holy Father on theology, notwithstanding Mr. Vance’s conversion to Catholicism just seven years ago and his lack of formal theological education. Most voters will not know this, and they will not know that Pope Leo was educated at the Catholic Theological Union in Chicago and studied Canon Law at the Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas in Rome. [Vance, following the advice, then said, “I think it is very, very important for the Pope to be careful when he talks about theology.”]

II.                 Secretary of War (and Expeditions) Pete Hegseth is instructed to continue his fashioning of the Iran conflict as a holy war. His analogizing the pilot rescue on Easter to Christ rising is just the kind of statement that is valued as a way to cast the President, by comparison, in a more reasonable light—grounded, shall we say. Praying at the Secretary’s Pentagon press conferences, citing God’s blessing on our troops, and declaring His lack of mercy on the enemy are off-the-wall statements endorsed by the White House. It would also be helpful to call the Iranian Muslims “enemy infidels who are destined for hell”—again, to help the President to be seen as moderate. Or to quote a fake Bible verse from a movie. [Hegseth took the advice. He quoted a mostly made-up passage from the film Pulp Fiction as if it were from Ezekiel. And he likened himself, his troops, and the administration to a healing force, with “Trump-hating” reporters as Pharisees, an ancient Jewish sect, who were “only looking for the negative” when they witnessed Jesus heal the sick. “Our press are just like these Pharisees,” Hegseth declared.]

III.              President Trump’s posting of an image of himself like Jesus, healing the sick, will be difficult to top, but it might inspire some of you to come up with another outrageous AI concoction. The purpose, again, is to make the President seem rational and cogent by comparison. A warning, however: Do not portray yourselves as God. Remember, the President does not like being relegated to inferior status, and you would undoubtedly depart soon thereafter to the Cabinet afterlife, wherever that might be.

        Good luck negotiating these treacherous waters. Please contact the office of the Chief of Staff with any questions. 

This is satire. It’s all made up (except for the quotes from Trump, Vance, and Hegseth), a disclosure made necessary by the absurdity of current reality, which prevents lots of people from telling the difference between truth and fiction.         

                

April 12, 2026

Is Israel to Blame for the Iran War?

 

By David K. Shipler 

            Israel’s government under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has given President Trump plenty of bad advice about Iran. But the rising belief that Israel is to blame for Trump’s war of choice deflects responsibility from the White House, where it obviously belongs. Trump failed to weigh Israel’s interests against those of his own country. He reportedly ignored his advisers’ doubts about Israel’s assessments and predictions.

            As the war damages the global economy and security, Israel is being teed up as a scapegoat. A most aggressive effort has come from Tucker Carlson, once a Trump cheerleader, whose recent rant against the war includes a malevolent portrait of a president at the mercy of Israel.

“The Israeli government has a storied history of blackmailing US presidents,” he writes absurdly in his Morning Note. “America’s ‘special ally’ is willing to play very dirty to achieve its goals. Dark-money campaign contributions, extortion, physical threats and even assassination. In their anti-Christian worldview, the ends always justify the means. They have no issue destroying lives.” (Carlson doesn’t mention “Jews,” but those with an antisemitic bent will surely read it that way.)

Americans’ longstanding support for Israel has weakened severely. Unfavorable opinions were driven up by Israel’s widespread bombing and brutal blockade of Gaza Palestinians following the October 7, 2023 atrocities by Hamas, and have risen further since the coordinated Israeli and American war on Iran was launched February 28. A Pew Research Center poll taken in March 23-29 found that 60 percent of American adults hold a negative view of Israel, up from 53 percent last year and 33 per cent in 2022. This could get worse if the conflict is not resolved beneficially to American interests. It’s not truly over, of course, and the eventual outcome will render judgment.

Netanyahu lobbied hard for this war, particularly on February 11, when he gained a rare invitation to a highly-classified meeting in the White House Situation Room. His pitch to Trump came in a period of terrible coincidence, a perfect storm of anxiety and extremism. Gripped by a heightened sense of vulnerability, Israel is led by the most radical, right-wing government in its history. The result is an anti-Arab and anti-Muslim strategy driven by religious absolutism and ethnic bigotry.

After the October 7 attack, a wave of existential fear swept through Israel. Hamas fighters, many on motorcycles, had managed to breach Israel’s high-tech defenses around Gaza, shredding confidence in the intelligence and military establishments. Iran then attacked mainly through its proxy, Hezbollah in Lebanon, forcing Israelis to leave their homes near the border. Others, evacuated from near Gaza in the south, added to an unprecedented population of internal refugees. Israel felt nearly encircled by Iran’s determination to annihilate the Jewish state.

It’s doubtful that Israel’s existence was truly at risk; it still had the Middle East’s most formidable military. But a muffled drumbeat of fear has always run through Israeli society, a legacy of the Holocaust reinforced by the perpetual conflict with the Palestinian Arabs. For most of its history, Israel’s counterpoint to fear has been aggressive defiance, which the Netanyahu government has translated into military onslaughts.

Israel demolished most of Iran’s air defenses and decimated both Hamas and Hezbollah. Last June, the US and Israel coordinated air attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities. The streets filled with huge numbers of Iranian citizens, hostile to the Islamic Revolution and suffering economically; many were gunned down, but Iran’s government looked weakened. The time for action seemed as ripe as it had ever been.

According to remarkable reporting by Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan in The New York Times, Netanyahu and the head of Mossad, Israel’s version of the CIA, argued that regime change would be triggered by a joint US-Israeli attack. The Israelis even played a video—imagery, not words, seem the major input to Trump’s brain—showing individuals who could take leadership.