By David K.
Shipler
Making
America Cruel Again: Part 3 of an Occasional Series
The more militant end of the
Palestinian spectrum, which has grown in recent years, will surely be delighted
by the Trump Administration’s latest deletion of aid. It cuts off $10
million for peacebuilding programs that
have brought together Israeli Jews, Israeli Arabs, and Palestinians from the
West Bank and East Jerusalem for professional workshops, school visits, and
joint projects designed to disarm the arsenal of suspicion and fear.
These get-togethers have been
denounced by Palestinian activists as efforts to “normalize” Israel’s dominance
over the West Bank by “showing that everything is okay,” according to Nava Sonnenschein,
an Israeli who runs such programs. The “anti-normalization movement” argues
that cooperative projects acquiesce to Israeli control of the area and thereby
subvert the goal of independent Palestinian statehood.
Some Palestinian participants have been
threatened. Several years ago, women journalists on the West Bank were warned
that if they joined a workshop for Jewish and Arab female journalists from
Israel, they would be expelled from the Palestinian journalists’ union. “Some
of them came nevertheless,” Sonnenschein said. “So they risked themselves
because they believed it was a way to change the other side.”
Indeed, creating “change agents” is a goal
of Sonnenschein’s School for Peace at Neve Shalom, a mixed Arab-Jewish village
in the hills between Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. When professionals—architects,
land-use planners, engineers, environmentalists, physicians, and other
influential adults from across the lines—are thrown together on the common
ground of their skills and interests, she believes, they return to their own
sides with a more open appreciation of the humanity and mutual concerns that
can bridge the divide. Some change agents have maintained contacts with those
in the other camp.
But in the latest episode of wizardry, Trump
and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, want to punish Palestinians’ failure to
negotiate for some nebulous notion of peace by cutting off programs that
promote peaceful connections. The School for Peace and other private
organizations have thrived on grants from the United States Agency for
International Development, as well as from the European Union. The American
funds will now support only projects that exclude Palestinians from the West
Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza, although Arab citizens of Israel may
participate.
It’s been hard enough to get West Bank
residents to the workshops, and virtually impossible for Gaza Palestinians. The
stigma of “normalization” weighs on some would-be participants, and permits for
Palestinians to enter Israel from the West Bank are hard to get from Israeli
authorities, who virtually never issue them to Gaza residents. In addition,
Israelis are prohibited by Israeli law from entering Gaza, which is controlled
by Hamas, or areas of the West Bank controlled by the Palestinian Authority.
One solution has been to hold workshops in the Jordanian city of Aqaba, but
that adds a costly travel expense.
Scrolling
down a list of projects now at risk, called Conflict Management and Mitigation
grants, makes you want to weep: empowering Israelis, Palestinians, and
Jordanians—primarily women and girls—to work on cross-border water management
in the valley from the Red Sea to the Dead Sea; assisting Israeli and
Palestinian almond farmers, date farmers, and olive growers and processors to
increase production and develop business relationships; promoting changes in
perceptions of children with disabilities; fostering civic involvement among
youth and parents to promote peace and religious tolerance in East and West
Jerusalem and adjacent West Bank towns; establishing pediatric programs for
cancer patients through Catholic Relief Services; training Israeli and
Palestinian teenagers to be entrepreneurs; organizing basketball and soccer in
joint teams of Israeli and Palestinian youngsters. And on and on. Good stuff,
all in the past tense unless other funding can be found.
This is the fourth strike in as many weeks
against the Palestinians. First came the Trump Administration’s decision to cut
$200 million a year in humanitarian aid to the West Bank and Gaza. Then came
the halt in all funding to UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency,
which finances schools and provides stipends to residents of Palestinian refugee
camps, not only in the West Bank and Gaza but also in Lebanon and Jordan. In
the last decade, the US has paid $233 to $400 million a year, about one-fourth
of UNRWA’s budget. Whether European and Arab countries will fill the gap
remains to be seen.
Third was the elimination of $25 million
in annual aid to hospitals in the largely Palestinian areas of East Jerusalem, which
could spell the collapse of some medical facilities.
Finally, the anti-peacebuilding decision.
All add up to assaults on rank-and-file Palestinians, not leaders, and amount
to the imposition of a hardball New York real estate culture on a very
different Middle East dynamic. The Trumpist approach of trying to kick the
Palestinians toward a deal by working hardships on ordinary folks might be effective
in an established democracy where ordinary citizens could vote out leaders who
made their lives miserable. Such is not the case in either the West Bank or
Gaza.
What will be the effect? Maybe nothing but
humiliation and anger, which already exist in abundance. But there are dire
predictions, which are a dime a dozen in a region where many of them come true.
Expectations are that restiveness and radicalization will increase in the West
Bank; that Muslim religious schools will draw students away from the UN’s ill-funded
secular schools; that terrorism against Israelis will rise; and that grassroots
accommodation to peaceful coexistence, which is vital to any ultimate resolution
of the conflict, will fail to grow as
the programs of connection dwindle. The cut in UNRWA funding could hurt Hamas in Gaza, where it rules, but help Hamas in the West Bank by undermining the Palestinian Authority led by the more moderate Mahmoud Abbas.
In any case, the Trump-Kushner approach
resembles the prescription heard from an Israeli taxi driver in 1988: “We
should go to the Arabs with sticks in hand, and we should beat them on the
heads; we should beat them and beat them and beat them, until they stop hating
us.”
No end to the stupidity and narrow-mindedness of Thumpf. He's beyond hope. If we can get through the next 2 1/2 years - maybe there will be hope of a new, workable president. Maybe.
ReplyDeleteLove your final anecdote!!! Kind of says it all. Thanks!
Trump is his own person, not being held by special interest and not being an expert, or even close to expert in foreign affairs.
ReplyDeleteHe does what his gut tells him to do. That goes for his early morning tweets as well as historical decisions on the home front and abroad. Not being a professional politician may actually work for him, in a strange way. My hope is that it will also work well for the country.