By David K. Shipler
Not
since the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy in 1968 has a senator’s death
inspired such an outpouring of affectionate eulogy as the loss of John McCain.
It takes nothing from McCain to observe that this week of mourning has been mostly
a celebration of contrast—the stark contrast between a decent man who traveled
a noble road and a corrupt president who wallows in the gutters of
vindictiveness.
Had McCain died three years ago,
before the advent of Trumpism, he would probably have been accorded due respect
but hardly the effusive tributes and live funeral broadcasts that have been
conveyed by “the enemy of the people,” as Trump enjoys calling America’s free
press. McCain’s stature has been enhanced, ironically, by the misdeeds of his
own party: Trump, who effectively dodged the draft, denigrated McCain’s ordeal
as a POW in North Vietnam; McCain, as a victim of Vietnamese torture, denounced
American torture under president George W. Bush; McCain stood up against Trump’s
divisive incivility toward Americans and his obsequious flirtation with Russia;
McCain gave his famous thumbs down on the Senate floor to his Republican
colleagues’ witless attempt to strip Americans of the health benefits of Obamacare. So
the late senator has now been immortalized as a principled, independent thinker
and a creative maverick.
That is an exaggeration. Mostly he
went along with his party on key conservative issues. And he certainly
exercised poor judgment from time to time: He and four other senators intervened
unethically with regulators on behalf of Charles Keating Jr., a bank executive
who gave his campaign $112,000 and later went to prison for fraud against
elderly investors. McCain later confessed to having learned a couple of
lessons, including a sensitivity to the mere appearance of conflict and a willingness
to address accusations openly in the press, rather than trying to hide. (“Flashing
his quick temper, he insulted, cursed and hung up on reporters questioning him
about his ties to Keating,” CBS reported.) He went on to team up with former Democratic
Senator Russ Feingold to champion limits on campaign financing.
Then, his choice of Alaska governor
Sarah Palin as his vice presidential running mate in 2008 helped doom his campaign and probably hardened
the country's tolerance for hateful ignorance in politics. It’s not far-fetched to
speculate that Palin’s colossal unfitness for office (“I can see Russia”) paved
the way for an acceptance of Trump. It certainly raised the threshold that political
malfeasance now has to pass to spark widespread outrage and disgust.
Still, McCain was a throwback to an
earlier Republican Party that didn’t vilify the Democratic opposition but
worked with it. In a perfect world, he would not have been remarkable in his
ability to rise above the personal and see the common good. Despite crippling
torture by his North Vietnamese captors after his Navy jet was shot down during
a bombing mission, he pressed successfully for the US to reconcile with Vietnam
and establish diplomatic and trade relations.
He had an inquisitive character
that transcended ideology. Soon after his release from prison, on a 1974 visit to South Vietnam recounted this week by Arnold R. Isaacs, then of the Baltimore
Sun, he displayed an open-minded curiosity about the progress of the war; he
seemed willing to hear bleak assessments from correspondents who were seeing at
ground level that things were going badly for the South after the American
withdrawal.
“McCain didn’t come to my room to
tell his own story or to talk about his visit,” wrote Isaacs (who is also my brother-in-law). “He wanted to listen, not talk, and get a more
independent, less sugar-coated perspective on Vietnam than he was hearing in
briefings from the U.S. embassy and Vietnamese government officials. During
those late-evening chats he’d tell me a bit about his day, but he was more
interested in whatever I might tell him about the situation in Vietnam.”
McCain said he hadn’t known much
about Vietnam before being shot down. “But since his release he had read
extensively, seeking to better understand what the war was about and what his
ordeal had been for. He couldn’t be objective, he added with characteristic
candor. After everything he’d undergone, he wasn’t ready to think the war was
all for nothing, or a mistake.
“Still, he had read all those
books, and here he was, asking questions that he surely knew might elicit
uncomfortable answers. I had no way to know what was in his mind, but I
wondered if he was seeking those answers almost against his will, out of some
involuntary need for truth that he might have resisted if he could.”
When
President Nguyen Van Thieu’s office offered to take McCain and other former
POWs anywhere they wanted to go, McCain shocked officials by asking for Con
Son, the notorious island prison where suspected Vietcong were kept in “tiger
cages” and subjected to brutal conditions. “With a tight smile,” Isaacs wrote, “McCain
explained that he had unwillingly become an expert on North Vietnamese prison
conditions and since he had the opportunity, he was curious to see how our ally
treated its prisoners.” After seeing Con Son, he told Isaacs that it was pretty
bad, though not as severe as in North Vietnam. “He did not go into any details,
other than telling me that he had had to ask repeatedly before prison officials
would tell him how many prisoners were on the island, and when they finally
gave him a number, McCain knew it was far too many to have adequate outdoor
exercise in the available space.”
With
some exceptions, such as his rant during the Keating scandal, McCain showed an
unusual respect for reporters who got into the weeds to find out what was going
on. The one time I interviewed him, for a piece on Vietnam vets in Congress, he
began by saying, “I’m honored to meet you.” I was sure he used the line often
to good effect, but it was disarming, even to a hard-boiled newsman. In any
case, I wasn’t there to challenge him. I wanted to know how his experience had affected
his view of the world and his positions on issues that came before Congress.
He said that it was critical,
before going to war, to have the overwhelming support of the American people.
He forgot that lesson when it came time to invade Iraq.
Although McCain planned his own services and funeral down
to small details, the pageantry has brought a rare resonance in a country
where, sadly, decency and moral principle in public life stand out as heroic
instead of routine.
Wonderful piece, Dave. You add so much to what I witnessed today. I agree with your assessments - totally agree. But what struck me today was how HUNGRY we Americans are for that sense of decency and morality and candor and almost nobility that was evident today! We crave it now that we're stuck with a crooked, lying, Know-Nothing, Bag of Garbage Con Man as President (through some kind of twisted, cruel, cosmic JOKE on the USA.) It was refreshing to watch that elegant, moving, truly beautiful funeral unfold and to have a sense that there are still DECENT people in this country, speaking in an articulate and honest manner about DECENT VALUES!! I found it truly refreshing! And for all the reasons you cite. What a day!...
ReplyDeleteThanks for your piece. I read it with great interest.
P.S. People said today that we'll never see the likes of a John McCain again - it's the end of an era. I don't agree at all. Of course we will see bright, decent, courageous, moral people again - and if anything today gives me hope that there are so many decent people out there - with good ideas and good thoughts to express. I found today very hopeful. I'm so glad I watched that funeral and heard what people had to say. It was good news for the future of our country - to my mind.
ReplyDelete