By David K. Shipler
If you lie
to your children, they will learn to lie to you. If you lie to your spouse, you
will create a family culture of falsehood in which he or she will, unless
strongly honest, lie to you as well. If you lie to your employees, don’t expect
them to pass uncomfortable truths up the chain of command. And if, as
president, you lie to the country and perhaps to your staff, many of them will
breathe the miasma of fabrication that emanates from the top, and will surely
assume that lying is an acceptable way of life in the White House.
So
President Trump’s dismissal of Michael Flynn for lying is like a projection of
Trump’s own personality flaw onto his subordinate. It is worth noting that this
happened only when the Flynn offense became public, courtesy of the “dishonest”
Washington Post, which Trump told
reporters aboard Air Force One that he hadn’t seen—a lie in itself, given that
he’d been told two weeks earlier by the Justice Department about the contents
of wiretapped conversations between Flynn and the Russian ambassador.
Does anyone think that the then
president-elect did not authorize those conversations, that Flynn just flew
solo without consulting with Trump? Is it possible that Trump ordered, or at
least approved, Flynn’s discussing the post-Ukraine sanctions with the ambassador,
perhaps obliquely suggesting that they could be eased by the incoming
administration? Then, in the poisonous atmosphere of the West Wing after the
inauguration, might Trump have wanted the substance of those discussions held
closely, even from Vice President Mike Pence, who is no Russia fan? So, was
Flynn just following his boss’s wishes in telling Pence that sanctions had not
been discussed?
And by the way, shouldn’t the
former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency know that the Russian
ambassador’s phone calls are monitored by the National Security Agency? Did Flynn figure on Trump’s having his back if transcripts were ever leaked? Note that
the day after asking for Flynn’s resignation, Trump called him “a wonderful man”
who was treated unfairly by the “fake media” and outed by leakers who committed
a crime.
You see, Mr. President, this is
what compulsive lying at the top leads to. Everything down below begins to look
like a lie as well.
Did Trump ever stop to wonder why
President Vladimir Putin refrained from the usual tit-for-tat after the Obama
administration punished Moscow for allegedly hacking Democratic emails? Thirty-five
Russian intelligence agents were expelled; normally, in retaliation, a similar
contingent of American agents in Russia would have been sent packing. Trump
credited Putin with being smart for not doing so. It now looks more like a quid
pro quo. But we are asked to believe that the Deal-Maker-in-Chief was entirely
unaware of the deal.
Flynn came to the post of national
security adviser with a reputation for peddling distortions, sardonically
called “Flynn facts” while he was head of the DIA. Had Trump not heard the
term, or didn’t he care? Did Trump admire Flynn’s ethnocentrism, Islamophobia,
reckless mismanagement, and zealous infighting? Evidently. But lying was the
cardinal sin.
No, not lying, exactly, for Trump
doesn’t mind lying to the American public. It’s his modus operandi. Pence doesn’t
mind either, although he doesn’t do it with a bludgeon, like Trump, but with a
slippery sheen. Here we enter a moral labyrinth: Apparently, lying is OK if you
know you’re lying. Being lied to is something else. And if you lie in public while
thinking that you’re telling the truth, because you’ve been lied to and don’t realize
it, that’s outrageous and unforgivable. Pence claims to have been told by Flynn
that sanctions had not been discussed, so Pence told the lie to the public,
only to have the lie exposed by intelligence agencies’ transcripts of phone
conversations. The only thing worse than lying or being lied to, it seems, is
getting caught.
This
incident is like a little fable demonstrating, once again, that it’s often the
cover-up that gets you in more trouble than the offense itself. So it was with
Nixon’s covering up his operatives’ break-in at the Democratic offices in
Watergate. So it was with Bill Clinton’s denial—under oath—of his sexual
relationship with Monica Lewinsky. Here, too, Flynn probably would have
survived if he had simply acknowledged that he had tried to defuse an
escalating spat with Russia. Perhaps he violated the never-enforced 1799 Logan
Act’s prohibition on private citizens contacting foreign officials and undermining
US foreign policy, but he would have gotten away with it.
Among the
many aspects of human nature that Trump does not understand is the immense
influence of a leader’s morality on the values of those who serve him. His
ethical blindness in mixing his private business with his governmental role is
an example, as the head of the Office of Government Ethics, Walter M. Shaub, observed in early January. In criticizing Trump’s refusal to divest from his assets, Shaub
declared, “Officials in any administration need their president to show ethics
matters, not only through words but through deeds.” He noted that other
officials would be held to account on such matters, and asked, “Should a
president hold himself to a lower standard than his own appointees?”
Trump is
modeling noxious behavior to his subordinates, who could run afoul of the law
if they mirror his indifference to conflict of interest and corruption. In the
area of truth-telling, too, he seems destined to warp the bureaucracy and receive
falsely upbeat reports from those who want to curry favor or keep their jobs. That
is what happened in the Soviet Union, a good-news system where displeasing
facts were filtered out at lower levels, producing a leadership remote from grassroots
reality.
Even in the open American system, where
robust debate is essential to wise policymaking, Trump has already shown a
desire to discourage internal dissent. When about a thousand State Department
officials signed a complaint through the department’s official channel about
Trump’s immigration ban, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said, “They
should either get with the program, or they can go.” Contrast that with former
Secretary of State John Kerry’s decision to meet with those who criticized Obama’s
hands-off strategy in Syria.
Disagreement is essential to good
government, and a president who models lying damages his ability to get
reliable information from the vast bureaucracies he manages. Only at their
peril will officials down below be honest with him. In promoting the virtue of
the lie, therefore, Trump seems destined to isolate himself from expertise and
make ill-considered decisions. In so doing he lays the groundwork for the
failure of his presidency.
Honestly, I don't think that Trump knows the difference between lying and not lying. He completely lacks all moral backbone, fiber and boundaries - any kind of moral "core" in my opinion. I think that moral core is something one develops as a child, largely as a result of careful, conscientious parenting - which I tend to think he didn't get much of - based on the result: a guy with no sense of morality at all. He's a True Psychopath - completely confused and without conscience or boundaries - not to mention "glib" - another well-known characteristic of such creatures - along with "always operating" - another one. So - to my way of thinking - asking him to be "upstanding" is a useless exercise in futility. The guy can't do it! He doesn't know what the hell someone like you - a very moral person - a person who thinks about moral issues and weighs moral questions - is talking about! It's sad - but that's what happens when people are destroyed in early childhood from lack of good (adequate) parenting. And it's happening all around us. The number of people who kill people because it's convenient to do so - is a good example of the lack of moral boundaries all around us - which results in a kind of psychopathy of society today - (with busy/distracted/absent parents too busy to set moral standards and enforce them!) And we can see the unfortunate results in the headlines every day! And, on "Forensic Files" - one of my favorite programs - because it shows REAL crime and REAL consequences and the REAL cost to society! - and is thereby fascinating - as well as horribly sad. All in all, really sad for our country! But best not to waste your energy wanting Trump to behave in a "decent" fashion - It ain't in him!! - He couldn't do it if you paid him a Billion smackaroos - which, come to think of it, he's already been paid. That's my assessment.
ReplyDelete