By David K. Shipler
The word “great”
is overused in this age of superlatives, but it’s no exaggeration when applied
to Syd Schanberg, whose coverage of Cambodia during its 1970s war has been
remembered almost reverently, since he died last week, by those who worked with
him. Here are three vignettes:
One evening
in Phnom Penh, as we were about to take Syd’s favorite government censor to a
French restaurant for rich food and copious amounts of wine—standard practice
to lubricate the “approved” stamp on controversial copy—Syd told me of a run-in
with a different Cambodian censor three years earlier. It had been 1970, as ethnic
Vietnamese in Cambodia were being attacked and imprisoned by the government and
civilians. Syd wrote of Vietnamese being placed in “internment camps.” The
censor, whose English was passable but not colloquial, said (as I recall Syd
recalling the quote), “Mr. Schanberg, the phrase ‘internment camps’ is not
correct. We are not imprisoning them. We are just bringing them together for
their own protection. We are concentrating them. You should say, ‘concentration
camps.’” That wouldn’t be such a good idea, Syd told the censor. In the story, I
believe, it came out just plain “camps.”
Syd had a towering sense of justice—some
might call it self-righteousness, and he could be prickly about it. He had a
keen eye, and his indignation flared over incidents that less sensitive people
would have considered insignificant. One day, when he and I were walking into
some government compound with Dith Pran—the storied Cambodian interpreter and
fixer whose trials and ultimate escape after the Khmer Rouge takeover were dramatized
in the film, “Killing Fields”—the Cambodian guard at the gate called Pran over
for a pat-down but was about to let us two Americans pass without a check. Syd
raised an angry protest, practically shouting at the guard that if he was going
to frisk Pran he was damned well going to frisk us as well. The guard, clearly
confused by this unique American who eschewed the privilege of being American, obediently
gave us both perfunctory pat-downs.
Syd’s moral outrage was not to be
resisted, as I saw when he, Pran, and I visited Neak Luong, the village where
an American B-52 in August 1973 had mistakenly dropped bombs in a long row
through the heart of the town. At the time, American officials pretended that
not much damage had been done, and under U.S. orders no doubt, Cambodian forces
sealed off the village so no journalists could get there to see for themselves.
With Pran’s canny help, he and Syd
got a boatman to take them to Neak Luong via the Mekong River, where Syd
recorded and reported, with the understated clarity of a gifted and careful
journalist, the simple facts that spoke the powerful truth.
“A third of the hospital is demolished,” Syd wrote, “with the rest badly
damaged and unusable until major repairs are made. Several patients were
wounded and some are believed killed. A bomb fell on the northeast corner of
the hospital, blowing some walls down and scattering concrete, beds and
cabinets.
“At his press briefing [U.S. air
attache] Colonel [David] Opfer, who visited Neak Luong within a few hours of the
bombing, said that there was ‘a little bit of damage to the northeast corner of
the hospital’ and talked about some ‘structural cracks’ in a wall.”
Several weeks later, Syd and Pran took
me along on a return visit to Neak Luong, this time in a helicopter of the U.S.
Agency for International Development, which had been mobilized by Syd’s
reporting to render assistance. Even that long after the bombing, there were
none of the usual smiles and laughs from children who usually flocked around
visiting foreigners. Kids stared at us vacantly, as if still in shock. Adult
survivors remained stricken. The hospital looked like a ruin, and it had
practically nothing of medical value to treat the injured.
There was fighting outside the town
that day, and we saw Cambodian boys in camouflage, hardly taller than the
rifles slung across their backs, getting ready to go out to combat. (Yes, the
U.S. supported child soldiers in the Cambodian army.) As two stretchers with
wounded soldiers were carried out of the thicket toward the hospital, a couple
of the boys stopped in their tracks, watched their comrades going by, then
resumed their halting steps into the thicket from which the stretchers had just
come.
It was obvious that the broken hospital
had no way to save the two Cambodian soldiers. Some reporters would have taken
pictures and notes. Syd took action. Knowing that the Cambodian military was
not flying helicopters into battle zones to evacuate the wounded, he went to
the American head of USAID in Cambodia, who had invited us along, and insisted
that he fly the soldiers back on his chopper to Phnom Penh. Now, the U.S.
Embassy detested Syd. As an institution, it excluded him from briefings as much
as possible and hated the way he wielded uncomfortable facts. But this USAID
man was no monster, and while he hesitated for a few beats, there was something
in Syd’s tone of voice and body language that was formidable.
So the soldiers were lifted into the
chopper, and as we took off, somebody asked me to try covering the sucking
wound in one man’s chest, which I did with a small plastic calendar from my
wallet, about the size of a credit card. I held it there so his lung would sort
of work while we flew directly to the hospital in Phnom Penh. We never learned
whether the two soldiers made it or not.
I didn’t think to ask Syd in later
years if he remembered his intervention. Probably not, it was so natural for
him.
thanks for these vignettes that are so revealing of the character and principles that guided Syd Schanberg as he pursued and reported the truth in the Cambodian war. Syd was a very good man and a very good friend. We will miss him.
ReplyDelete--Joseph L. Galloway