By David K. Shipler
At Sunday’s Super Bowl, the United
States will congratulate itself on another racial milestone, the first time two
Black quarterbacks have played in the culminating game of the country’s most
popular sport. “Jalen Hurts and Patrick Mahomes will make history on Sunday,” crowed CBS News.
But the history is a lesson in bigotry,
illustrating how devious stereotypes can be.
The latest “first” is a cause for
celebration, to be sure. It is no exoneration of American society, however, for
the racial assumptions that have made this so long in coming still whirl around
Blacks, whether professional athletes or ordinary mortals. Tangible barriers
that are broken often leave a strong residue of bias—in this case, about the interactions
of the mind, the body, and the power of Blacks on the field or off.
Americans love to chart progress. We have
had the first Black president, the first Black vice president, the first Black
defense secretary, the first Black secretary of state, the first Black Supreme
Court justice, the first Black chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and on.
And now “the first Black House Minority Leader in history” as President Biden said
in his State of the Union Address, congratulating Representative Hakeem
Jeffries.
Whether
Jeffries was pleased or displeased by the label was hard to tell by the neutral
expression on his face. Not every Black or Muslim or woman or gay person who gets
past the obstacle loves being defined primarily that way. Jeffries and the rest
of us might reasonably wonder if the day will ever come when the phrase “the
first Black [fill in the blank]” can be relegated to a distant past.
The first Black quarterback to start
in the Superbowl was Doug Williams, who led the Washington Redskins to victory
in 1988. He won the Lombardi Trophy and was named the game’s most valuable
player. But he hadn’t been the team’s starter at the beginning of the season, when
Black quarterbacks overall started fewer than 10
percent
of NFL games.
Several years later, for my book A Country of
Strangers,
I looked into the patterns of prejudice that was keeping Black players out of
the quarterback position. A system of tracking was putting high school athletes
on career-changing detours, especially if they came from mostly Black schools,
according to Richard L. Schaefer, former attorney for the National Football
League Players Association. On college teams, he said then, talented Black
quarterbacks were being bumped to other positions considered more physical than
mental. “I think it’s a subtle, perhaps even subconscious, kind of bigotry.”
The bigotry pairs two of the society’s longest-standing stereotypes of Blacks as both physically strong and mentally weak. Since at least the days of Thomas Jefferson, who codified those images in his book Notes on the State of Virginia, there has been a tendency in white America to see the body and the mind as opposite poles, perceptions that persisted and shaped college and NFL coaches’ decisions centuries later.
Sportscasters used to call a good play by
a Black an “athletic move” and by a white a “smart move.” You don’t hear that distinction
much anymore, but the assumptions once took their toll. “There is a tradition
in sports of saying that when the Black guy succeeds, he’s a great natural ” Schaefer
observed in the 1990s. “When the white guy succeeds, it’s due to hard work and
perseverance and his own dedication to his sport.” This implied “that it’s just
a physical versus a mental thing.”
The practice of sorting Blacks players out
of so-called thinking positions was documented by the Players Association in a
1980 report: “The ‘Black Positions’—running back, defensive back, and wide
receiver—were rated by the coaches as demanding physical speed, physical
quickness, and high achievement motivation.” Blacks were shunted away from
quarterback, center, and linebacker, who “tend to have the greatest opportunity
to have a controlling influence on the outcome.”
The positions long denied to Blacks were leadership
and decision-making roles requiring “frequent social interactions calling for
interpersonal acceptability,” the Players Association observed. Those were also
the spots from which players could graduate after retirement to managerial jobs
in professional football.
But Blacks in power have long stirred discomfort,
ambivalence, or outright resentment among a swath of white America, as if the
natural order of society were being disrupted. Witness the backlash to Barak
Obama achieving the presidency, a much more visceral revulsion among rightwing
whites than policy differences alone could explain.
“In pro football’s portion of the civil
rights struggle, the last positions to be desegregated were center, middle
linebacker and quarterback,” Samuel G. Freedman once wrote. “Those
three spots, not coincidentally, required the greatest intellectual acumen,
because they involved calling the blocking assignments (center), defensive
alignment (middle linebacker) and the entire offense (quarterback). In the late
1960s, white supremacist perceptions still kept Blacks from quarterbacking an
NFL team. No Black player could possibly be smart enough, have the required
strength of character or possibly give orders to white teammates.”
Bias was self-defeating, of course, in
sports as in every area of life, by excluding whole reservoirs of talent. In
fact, Southern resistance to school desegregation eventually eroded partly
because of Black students playing on integrated teams. The white chairman of B,
E & K Construction Company in Birmingham, Alabama, put it this way to me back
in the late 1990s. “The first thing that caught the attention of the whites in the
South, in my view, was that they started realizing that they could win football
games with black athletes. I really believe, when I think back, that that’s
what turned them around.”
College and pro football took the
same lesson eventually, and the roster of Black quarterbacks has grown to
include impressive, quick-minded readers of complex field positions and precise
executors of intricate plays.
Mahomes, of the Kansas City Chiefs, is
biracial and identifies as Black. He will meet Hurts, of the Philadelphia Eagles
Sunday in the dazzling spectacle that is bound to blind most of the country to
the continuing prejudices that have shaped American society, football included.
Both men played quarterback in college, a big change from decades past.
That
doesn’t mean that the biases have disappeared, especially outside the stadium.
If only the game were the template for the country as a whole.
What I see as especially wonderful is black and white players embracing in mutually felt ecstasy at epiphanal moments in all such contests--touchdowns, interceptions, sacks, turnovers. That equality of ecstasy is really to be treasured as part of the American spirit and a central component of the American landscape.
ReplyDeleteA nice observation, David, and another element of the game that I wish could be exported off the field. We just have to be careful not to let those feel-good moments obscure our understanding of the racial frictions outside the stadium.
ReplyDeleteI do understand (and totally agree, Dave) .... but there is one other lacuna: who are you rooting for ??!!!
ReplyDelete;-))
I don't really care who wins as long as it's a close and exciting game. The teams I would have rooted for got winnowed out in the playoffs.
ReplyDelete