By David K. Shipler
A significant
struggle, invisible to most Americans, is occurring along the northern New England
coast to save both an endangered species of whale and an endangered way of
life. It is a clash of priorities, values, and even basic facts, that could
leave both North Atlantic right whales and Maine lobstermen as victims. You can
see the high stakes when tough men of the sea have fear in their eyes.
New federal
regulations, enacted and in the works, are being challenged by Maine officials
and lobstermen as unjustified. And the private sector has now escalated the
conflict with a call to boycott lobsters. Issued from the other side of the
country by the Monterey Bay (California) Aquarium’s Seafood Watch, it is based on
information that is far from conclusive about the danger posed to the whales by
ropes used in lobstering. The move seems wildly excessive, has undermined the
conservationists’ credibility, and has further polarized the players in an
effort that cries out for sensible solutions.
Also, by the way, boycotting lobsters
won’t save the whales.
The
problem looks clearcut on its face. The estimated number of North Atlantic
right whales has declined precipitously from about 480 in 2010 to under 350 today.
Their mortality rate is high, mostly because of interaction with humans: many
are struck by ships, and many others are entangled in rope from both gillnets
and lobster gear, which can open wounds and lead to lethal infection. The
demise of females has led to a decline of newborn calves below the 50 per year needed
for the population to recover. Fifteen have been born so far in 2022.
From here, the problem gets complicated. Climate change contributes, because as the Gulf of Maine warms faster than any other part of the earth’s oceans, the whales have followed their main food source—the tiny shrimplike calanus finmarchicus—northward into Canadian waters, notably the Gulf of St. Lawrence, a shipping area where collisions are likely.
A speed limit of 10 knots in
certain areas has been imposed on vessels over 35 feet by both Canada and the
United States. Right whales are notoriously slow—and maybe a little dumb—one reason
they were easy targets for whalers in the old days: the “right whales” to harpoon
and also pick up, since they float after death. I once watched several swimming
so ponderously off the Canadian island of Grand Manan that they’d obviously have
no chance of getting out of the way of a big cargo ship or a fast boat.
In full disclosure, this is an
appropriate place to confess my competing biases. I love to go whale-watching.
When the Gulf of Maine was cooler, I occasionally took my boat out to Mt.
Desert Rock, about 18 miles offshore, where minke and humpback whales liked to
roam before they mostly moved north.
I’ve watched whales from Alaska to
Antarctica, from offshore near Washington State down to the coast of
California, from eastern Canada down to Cape Cod Bay. So, like everyone else—including
lobstermen, I might add—I’m partial to whales. There might be nothing on this
planet as majestic as two gargantuan humpbacks out in the Gulf of Maine breaching
together in the early twilight, propelling themselves completely out of the water
in unison, dancers in an ancient pageant.
I’m also partial to the lobstermen
I’ve grown friendly with during the part of each year I live on an island off
the coast of Maine. They are flinty individualists—about 5,000 altogether in
the state—who own their own boats, go to sea hours before the rest of us know
that a new day is dawning, and take on weather that should make a mortal
tremble. The gender walls are gradually breaking down, with some men
encouraging their daughters to go lobstering, and more and more women setting
out.
Like farmers, they’re at the mercy
of elements they don’t control. Some years are good, and they make big bucks.
Some are lean. The catch rises and falls, and the market is fickle. Last year,
in a post-pandemic surge of demand, lobstermen were getting $7 to $8 a pound at
the boat; this summer, it was down to $3.25 or so. The costs of bait and diesel
fuel have soared, so just to break even each day, they have to haul a lot of
traps with a lot of pounds. Some fishermen were taking days off to save on the
expenses.
The gear is expensive, too. A three-foot
trap goes for nearly $90, a buoy around $10, plus swivels, bait bags, and thin rope
(called “pot warp,” priced by the pound), all adding up to some $150—more if
you have multiple traps on each trawl, as the federal government is now
requiring. So losing all that to a whale is no delight for either party.
Lobster traps sit on the bottom, and
the pot warp that runs up to buoys on the surface is the alleged culprit. Those
vertical lines can entangle whales, including those that spend summers in
Canadian waters but migrate south along the Maine coast to breeding grounds off
the Carolinas, Georgia, and Florida.
The dispute is this: When a whale
is found dragging rope, or with scars showing a past entanglement, whose rope
is it? Where did it come from? Canada? Maine? Massachusetts? Maine was not a
location of any observed incidents of death or serious injury from 2017 to the
present, listed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Twenty-one of the 33 dead right whales
in that period were
found in Canada, and the remaining 12 scattered in waters off
Massachusetts, Virginia, New York, New Jersey, North and South Carolina, and
Florida. The same with seriously injured whales: eight in Canada and 12 from
Massachusetts to Georgia.
The lack of solid proof of Maine involvement
is cited by the Maine Lobsterman’s Association, backed up by Maine’s governor,
two senators, and two House representatives—Democratic, Republican, and Independent—to
assert that not a single death of a right whale has ever been attributed to
Maine lobster gear, and that no entanglements with rope from Maine waters have
been documented in the last 18 years.
Yet the lobster fishery has been
hit with a series of federal regulations aimed at reducing the prevalence of
those lines and to require breakaway rope that releases more easily, at 1700
pounds, with more restrictions to come that will make lobstering even more
difficult, risky, and costly. Areas offshore totaling 1,000 square miles are
being closed from October 1 to January 31, and 5, 10, 15, 20, or 25 traps per
trawl are being
mandated in various Maine areas to reduce the amount of vertical line.
Splicing in breakaway line is labor
intensive, and large numbers of traps on a trawl are expensive, since it’s too
dangerous to have 25 traps aboard at once without extra hands. When the traps
are cast off and sink fast, the line whips out with them; a lobsterman can get
an ankle caught and be dragged overboard; it happens. So, where a captain once
hired a single sternman, he would now need two for safety, and sternmen get a
percentage of the take.
Then, there is talk of ropeless
technology to be used in areas otherwise closed. It is not yet perfected: The
trap would have a buoy bound to it on the bottom, to be released when the lobsterman
activates a coded sonar signal.
This sounds clever, but lobstermen give
lots of reasons why it won’t work. One explained to me the other day that buoys
tell him where other traps are located; without them, he might set his on top
of somebody else’s: a reasonable concern, since multiple lobstermen tend to set
traps near one another in promising areas. Also, who will pay the added cost of
the gadgetry?
These regulations make many Maine
fishermen feel as entangled as the whales, and as threatened. One of my friends,
out on his boat this summer while I came alongside to talk, told me how glad he
was that his son was not following in his footsteps.
But what are the facts? I put the question
to NOAA—citing the lack of hard data—and got an interesting answer from a
spokesperson, Katie Wagner.
First, she said in an email, “in
most years, only one third of right whale mortalities are observed,” according
to a Duke University mammal
density model. So the causes of death are not known.
Second, when dead or injured whales
are spotted, determining who owned the rope has been nearly impossible. “Entanglement
injuries are often observed without gear remaining on the whale,” Wagner wrote,
noting that 85 percent of all right whales have scars from the lines. “When
gear is remaining it is rarely retrieved. In those rare cases when gear is
retrieved, it usually carries no area-specific marking and can only be
identified to a geographic area fewer than half the time.”
NOAA’s conclusion?
“We cannot dismiss the likelihood
that Maine buoy lines, which make up the majority of buoy lines in waters where
right whales occur, are responsible for some of the serious injuries and
mortalities.”
Not dismissing the likelihood is
not proof. It’s what a court might call circumstantial evidence, which is sometimes
used to convict someone of a crime—but sometimes produces wrongful convictions.
Wagner went on to provide a
significant fact that strengthens the case, though. In the last two years, Maine
lobstermen have
been required to use purple and green line inserts or paint to identify
their trawls. Since then, although no right whales have been found entangled in
such rope, other large species have been.
“In 2021, a humpback whale was
disentangled from gear fished by a Maine fisherman in Federal waters (purple
and green marks),” she said. “In 2020 and 2021, two dead minke whales in rope
with purple marks, and two disentangled minke whales in rope with purple marks
were documented. Given the low number of right whales, documented entanglements
are more rare, but even one serious injury or mortality exceeds” the level at which
eventual extinction can be avoided.
The
Seafood Watch boycott has so infuriated Maine’s congressional delegation that
Sen. Angus King and Representative Jared Golden have introduced a bill to block
federal funding to the Monterey Bay Aquarium, which has received almost $197
million since 2001. My requests to the aquarium for detailed evidence to
support their position on lobstering went unanswered.
In the
end, though, global warming might kill lobstering before boycotts or
right-whale regulations do. Lobsters like cold water. South of here, lobstering
has declined. Several years ago, when an environmental lawyer lectured at the
local library on right-whale regulations, he ended by warning that the
lobstermen in the audience should be more worried about climate change. That is
where I saw fear in their eyes.
Fantastic investigation of the facts. Shipler once again hits the nail on the head. Only hope those in power rethink their approach and the damage they are doing by working to destroy of livelihood of so many hard working and intelligent lobster men and women.
ReplyDelete