By David K. Shipler
A
crucial feature of the Soviet Union’s dictatorship was its enforcement by
peers. Your co-workers, your schoolmates, the fellow members of your local
Communist Party committee or Komsomol (Communist youth organization) were
primed to call you to account if you deviated from the norm. If you went to
church regularly, your Komsomol committee might hold a meeting to denounce you.
If you went farther and made “anti-Soviet” statements—criticizing government
policy or advocating democratic reforms—your peers in Komsomol might be
assembled for a vote to expel you, which would handicap your future job
prospects. In the post-Stalin era, imprisonment was usually reserved for the
most stubbornly outspoken; less dramatic disobedience could be curtailed by
lesser means.
It was not an airtight system. It aspired to
totalitarianism but fell short. It contained eddies of quiet noncompliance,
which allowed small pools of independent thinking. But orthodoxy had power, wielded
both vertically from the top down, and also horizontally in a milieu of
conformity. As a result, most Soviet citizens acquiesced politically and never
bumped up against the hard limits of dissent. Newspaper editors, for example,
rarely had to be confronted by the censors; writers and their bosses
internalized the restrictions, even endorsed them, and so knew the comfortable scope
of the permissible.
That is
approximately what the Republican Party appears to strive for in 2021, not only
in the party organization itself but in the broader society. It is a new
American Dream, aspiring to a comprehensive, unitary way of thinking about
history, culture, law, politics, science, religion, and race. The odd thing is
that it is pursued in the guise of individualism, touting the preeminence of
personal free choice, while in fact it is driven by just the opposite—the thrust
of group-think.
This horizontal enforcement is a hallmark of the emerging Republican strategy. A catechism of professed beliefs is monitored for irreverence, and the punishment is akin to excommunication. Absolutism is required: adore Donald Trump, reject the 2020 election as stolen, dismiss the January 6 insurrection as insignificant, refuse to investigate it.
Peer policing has also been introduced
outside the Republican Party ranks: The majority-Republican legislature in
Texas recently empowered private citizens anywhere to sue abortion providers in
the state over real or imagined violations of restrictive anti-abortion laws. The
tactic is a ploy to make the laws harder to block in the courts, where
government is typically the target of lawsuits by pro-choice advocates. Here,
government would not be the enforcer; any citizen might be. But the tactic has large
implications, for any citizen who wins a suit gets a $10,000 award. That
creates a population of bounty hunters, diffusing power into a miasma of unaccountability, and it encourages informers, just as dictatorships do.
It is an example of Republican
hostility to pluralism, to the robust debate of ideas that fuels American
democracy. Recent legislative bans on public schools’ teaching critical race
theory are methods of censoring the truthful history of racial bias and
discrimination. Tennessee’s prohibition against health officials’ informing
adolescents about COVID vaccines effectively censors scientific knowledge and stifles
best medical practices. The anti-vaccine movement fostered by Republican
officials and their talk-show disciples sacrifices the common good on the altar
of individual freedom.
On the surface, that resistance to
the collective demand looks as if it stands at the opposite end of the spectrum
from Soviet Communism’s collectivist ethic. But look more closely. The mantra
of individual free choice is a deception when you are manipulated by the
conservative right into a collective of another kind: the subculture of alienated
doubters who feel a sense of belonging to a group that fancies itself as
smarter than the “experts” who have researched and developed and tested
vaccines. “I Love My Country But I Fear My Government,” reads a bumper sticker on
a pickup truck in Maine.
Distrust of government, of any
establishment except one worshiping Trump, qualifies you for trusting membership
in associations of the alienated, even if those groups exist only online. Can
anyone really argue that Republicans falling in line are models of
individualism?
Right-wingers who are accused of
smothering respectful discourse often resort to whataboutism—what about those
on the left who cancel white professors and others for racist or sexist
remarks, or who fail to utter mea culpas of white guilt? Isn’t that a suppression
of speech and an attack based on skin color? Isn’t that the product of herd
mentality and mob thinking?
It goes without saying that
intolerance and absolutism can be found at many points on the political spectrum, including
the liberal end. But the claim of moral equivalency between the right and the
left is a canard. Only one of the two major political parties in the United
States has become a conduit of far-right conspiracy theories and apocalyptic
yearnings. Only one party’s legislators are busily corrupting state electoral
mechanisms, both by impeding voting and disarming and threatening principled
officials and volunteers who count the ballots. It appears that the Trump
Republicans’ election challenges of 2020 were merely a dry run that exposed the
system’s pressure points. In state after Republican-led state, the bulwarks against rigged and fraudulent elections are being undermined.
When
people are asked if they fear the loss of pluralistic democracy, many comfort
themselves by citing history--the periods of strife and oppression that the country
visited upon itself, and yet managed to survive. The massacres and exiles of
Native Americans. Slavery. The Civil War. Racial segregation. The McCarthy-era’s
witch hunts. The twisted white faces of hatred that greeted little Black
children being escorted into integrated schools. Cold War surveillance and
political arrests. The anguished polarization over the Vietnam War. And
numerous other self-inflicted heartaches along the way. America is resilient,
it is said, and Americans are deeply decent, devoted to country and freedom. We
will come through this time, too.
That answer has the allure of
complacency and the danger of error. It is time for all Americans who cherish
democracy to emerge from their shadow of disbelief.
Sad to say, little of this new. The GOP has been fundamentalist in thought for decades. To an extent, that’s the old time definition of conservative. What’s news here is how visible the Republican dream — no, goal — of an authoritarian oligarchy is and how close, after decades of work, they are to accomplishing that goal. Indeed, it’s possible that the goal has already been reached in view of our leaders woeful lack of concern of being responsive to the majority’s wishes and wellbeing. What’s good for the nation has been regularly ignored and acted against since Reagan. Serving special interests and pandering to their voters is all the party does. Criticism from the Democrats and media is, to say the least, far from vigorous.
ReplyDelete