By David K. Shipler
I spent
last week in Russia and felt as if I had woken up, after a long sleep, to an
unrecognizable world. Putting aside the
nefarious activities of Vladimir Putin’s government—Crimea, Ukraine, cyberattacks,
Novichok, and the police-state mechanism poised to act at Putin’s whim—Russia
has revolutionized itself, at least on the surface.
I’d
last been there 25 years ago, in the liberalizing Gorbachev era and then right
after the breakup of the Soviet Union, so I witnessed the beginning of change:
a freer discourse, an occasional private restaurant devoted to pleasing
customers rather than repelling them. But my true reference point, the time I
seem to have fallen deeply asleep, was the communist period of the late 1970s,
when I lived in Moscow for four years. Awakening last week, I felt like some
country rube who had never seen a city’s bright lights. Or, as my son Michael
noted as we traveled to Moscow and St. Petersburg for the World Cup, I seemed
to be switching glasses all the time, looking through Soviet lenses in utter
amazement.
Gone
are the depressingly gray state-run stores and restaurants with empty shelves,
long lines, and unsmiling clerks and waiters with no motivation to serve.
Decent restaurants in Soviet days required connections to get reservations, and
some had signs screwed permanently to the doors saying, “Myest Nyet,” “No
Room.” Who wants customers when you get paid anyway by the state? And except
for the caviar, the food was rarely gourmet. A Russian joke went this way:
Customer:
Is the fish fresh?
Now,
people have somehow learned how to prepare excellent dishes of a wide variety
in tastefully designed restaurants and cafes with tables that spill out onto
sidewalks as abundantly as in Paris, at least on the streets of central Moscow
and St. Petersburg. There is hardly a place where you can’t get a good cappuccino,
usually dressed with a leafy silhouette of cream floating on top. And beef—which
was tough and tasteless in Soviet days—can be had at extremely high quality in
a Moscow place sardonically named “No Fish,” surely some wit’s sly reference to
the era of deprivation, when fish stores routinely had no fish—and meat stores
no meat, for that matter.
Next to
our modest hotel was the Beverly Hills Café, designed as a retro 1950s diner
with burgers, shakes, 50s American rock in the background, statues of American
performers in front, and a bevy of young waitresses in yellow miniskirts. MacDonald’s
and Burger Kings dot the landscape, and on the block of our old apartment
(nicely renovated and still home to a New
York Times correspondent), stand a Starbucks next to a grill where a decent
lunch can be had. Before I fell asleep, the block was faceless and austere, and
good luck finding a quick lunch anywhere nearby.
Around
the corner, on the site of an outdoor farmer’s market where produce and meat
were scarce and prices high, stands a fancy, multistory mall whose ground floor
wreaks of perfume by Dior and other upscale brands. The food is on the top
floor, where the cases of beef, the tank of live fish, the assortment of delicacies
rival any Western gourmet establishment. The prices are similar, too, which
must put the goods way out of reach for the average Russian; virtually nobody
was shopping there.
Central
economic planning by Soviet government officials guaranteed that “the people,”
who were supposed to own the means of production, received not what they wanted
but what the remote bureaucrats decided they should have. The encroachment of
capitalism, as inequitable as it might be, has also been a kind of liberating
influence, transferring consumer power, at least, to ordinary folks.
So, gone
are the frumpy clothes and scowling faces; Russians now dress the way Americans
do casually on the streets: T-shirts, shorts, and most striking, jeans, which
were so passionately coveted in Soviet days that some daring American tourists
would sell them to Russians at exorbitant prices, and the few Russians
authorized to travel abroad would bring home suitcases crammed full. No need
now: Russia has been quietly invaded by Lee and Levi.
Gone also
is the easy driving for those few Russians who had the connections to get cars.
Traffic no longer breezes through mostly vacant streets with virtually no
parking restrictions; congestion is common, parking is scarce, and taxi drivers
grumble about sudden road closures around the Kremlin to let black sedans exit
through the mammoth gates. At the end of the workday one afternoon, as traffic
ground to a halt, a driver explained with a sardonic grin. Government officials
“have finished drinking,” he said, and were heading home.
Religion,
barely tolerated and tightly constricted in Soviet days, has blossomed symbolically
in Moscow and especially St. Petersburg, where the fresh glint of gold leaf
illuminates the onion domes and high crosses that were once left to fade and
decay. A liturgical store of religious books and icons beckons patrons near Red
Square. And over the two gates of the Kremlin facing the square, massive icons
have been installed, as if to certify an official imprimatur conferred on the
Russian Orthodox Church.
Of
course the church was always under the thumb of the government—under the czars
and under the Communists—infiltrated by apparatchiks and manipulated for
official ends. But Soviet days saw ambivalence toward the church as both an
artifact of tradition and beauty on the one hand, and antithetical to Marxist
ideology on the other. On Easter at midnight, young people were tempted away
from services by theaters showing—one time only—first run American films. And
those who sought to attend church found themselves confronted by rings of
auxiliary policemen who would check IDs and report them to their chapters of
the Young Communist League.
How
deeply religion has reached into the society is a question, however, one I can’t
answer based on a short visit. A civil “wedding palace” on the bank of the Neva
in St. Petersburg seemed constantly busy as we walked by repeatedly last week,
and a young Russian guide in St. Isaac’s cathedral explained to her small group
that most young people aren’t really interested, except for the church’s aesthetics
and its connection to Russian history, something that was said in Soviet days
as well.
Bookstores
were mind-blowing. There on the shelves were volumes once banned, by Osip
Mandelshtam, Boris Pasternak, Anna Akhmatova, and others. Both Moscow and St.
Petersburg have squares or streets named after Andrei Sakharov, the
pro-democracy campaigner who was stripped of his work as a nuclear physicist in
Soviet days, denied permission to travel to Oslo to receive the Nobel Peace
Prize, and exiled to the city of Gorky until released by Gorbachev. I sometimes
felt as if I were sleep-walking.
The
World Cup brought swarms of foreigners, to the delight of the tourist industry
and Russians who want contact with the larger universe. Smiles and warmth,
mostly reserved in Soviet days to intimate gatherings around kitchen tables,
radiated the public places in Moscow. A middle-aged Russian woman on the Metro,
seeing my 10-year-old granddaughter, Kalpana, spontaneously handed her a wand
for making soap bubbles. A man gave her a coin. And as we joined a huge crowd
waiting to enter the Metro after a match in St. Petersburg, an unsmiling police
commander, glancing at Kalpana, gestured us to the side and led us around to an
entrance where, waving to his officers on guard, he watched us walk through
like VIPs.
Russian
softness toward children is nothing new; it’s a long, happy tradition, always a
strong counterpoint to the stern features of the powerful and potentially
ruthless state. And that level of political oppression was a layer of society
to which we did not penetrate, cruising on the festive surface of swinging
Moscow and St. Petersburg. Nor did the country’s economic hardship become
apparent; the centers of those cities were scrubbed clean of both peeling paint
and human suffering.
On
our last night, we dined at the Library, a pleasant restaurant on Nevsky
Prospekt, where the bill came tucked inside a book. I am still wondering if the
restaurant’s manager, or a waiter, was playing with a metaphor, because the
book jacket gave the title, in Russian, as Money
by Emil Zola. The book itself, however, was the second volume of Lenin’s works,
written in the late 19th century and published under Stalin in 1941.
You can’t tell a book by its cover.
Oh, what a wonderful, happy report! I'm going to send this on to my Russian friends. I'm sure they'll appreciate it!
ReplyDeleteP.S. I think this means there's hope for humanity - if we wait long enough! Vietnam seems to say the same thing, in its own way. There IS hope! Nice to believe that.
ReplyDelete