By David K. Shipler
If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget her cunning.
Psalm 137:5
The city of
Jerusalem, whose sandstone facades glow ethereally in the slanting light of
dawns and dusks, stands on a spine of hills along the lands of milk and of
honey. To the east, the land plunging down into the Judean Desert has been traditionally
hospitable to milk-producing goat herds. To the west, the fertile coastal plain
along the Mediterranean has been sweet with orchards.
That is the
basic biblical geography. At this intersection of semi-nomadic peoples and
settled farmers, Jerusalem has been enriched and burdened by ancient affinities
and faiths. Its map today is enhanced and scarred by the overlays of history,
religion, and nationalism, a treacherous landscape into which President Trump has
now stumbled clumsily.
What forces he has unwittingly set
loose we do not yet know; predictions in that part of the world are for
prophets or fools. But his decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of
the Jewish State alone, without also recognizing the Palestinians’ yearning for
Jerusalem as the capital of their aspirational state, surely diminishes America’s
maneuverability.
It’s hard to see what the United States
gains from Trump’s move. For the limited profit of catering to his big donors
and his narrow base, Trump has tossed away the American coin of neutrality—as tarnished
as it was by years of tilting toward Israel’s interests. Not many Palestinians
thought of Washington as truly unbiased, since no previous administration did more
than use strong words against Israel’s confiscation of territories for Jewish
settlement in the mostly Palestinian West Bank and the eastern districts of
Jerusalem. No penalty was exacted: no withholding of aid, no reduction of
military support. And now Trump has asked nothing from Israel in exchange for
his endorsement.
Jerusalem’s fate was supposed to be
left open, according to international law and consensus, pending a final Israeli-Palestinian
peace. But formal American policy and high-sounding pronouncements have never thwarted
persistent Israeli encirclement and fragmentation of the city’s Palestinian
areas, especially under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Contrary to Israeli
claims to possess a unified Jerusalem, the city is more severely divided by
culture, language, identity, religion, and fear than at any time since it was
reassembled under Israeli control in the 1967 war.
The walled Old City, whose courses
of stones date from Herod up to the Ottomans, contains the distillation of the
world’s three monotheistic religions. But few Israeli Jews dare roam the
vibrant, cobbled alleys of its Muslim Quarter, thick with the pungent smells of
coffee and cardamom, to bargain for carpets or buy honeyed pastries. Few
Palestinian Arabs venture into the guarded Jewish Quarter or into mostly Jewish
West Jerusalem. Israeli Jews don’t generally shop on Saladin Street, and Arabs
don’t frequent stores near Zion Square.
A couple of previous Israeli
governments floated ideas for sharing Jerusalem, but the Palestinian leadership
either rejected or ignored the offers. Radicalization, eating away the middle
ground of compromise, has fostered absolutism, and neither side is now inclined
toward division or joint jurisdiction.
The intransigence is a hallmark of
the conflict’s evolution from a clash of nationalisms with competing
territorial claims to the less easily negotiated clash of historical and
religious identities. Leaving the Christians aside—the Church of the Holy
Sepulcher stands where the oldest denominations believe Jesus was crucified and
buried—the knottiest religio-historical entanglements are on the manmade
plateau in the Old City known to Jews as the Temple Mount, and to Muslims as
Haram al-Sharif, the Noble Sanctuary.
There, an outcropping of bedrock
was believed, in ancient Jewish tradition, to be the core around which God
created the earth. It is that rock on which the Prophet Abraham is said to have
prepared to sacrifice his son Isaac. It figures in Islam as the spot from which
the Prophet Muhammad left on his horse for his night journey to heaven.
Modern Israel is probably the only
conqueror, besides Britain after World War I, that has not put its own religious shrine on the mount. In ancient
times, the First Jewish Temple of Solomon stood there until the Jews’ exile
into Babylon in 587 B.C.E. The Jews’ Second Temple under Herod was plundered by
the Greeks, who installed an image of Zeus, and the Romans burned it down in 70
C.E., replacing it with a temple to Jupiter and statues of their emperors. In
638, Muslim conquerors built a mosque on the site, which the Crusaders
converted into a church. It was restored as a mosque—now the third holiest site
in Islam—when the Muslims ousted the Crusaders at the end of the twelfth
century.
When Israeli soldiers captured the
Old City from the Jordanians in 1967, an advance unit climbed into the golden
Dome of the Rock, which encloses the sacred outcropping, and hoisted an Israeli
flag at its top. Moshe Dayan, Israel’s defense minister, immediately ordered it
removed, lest the Muslim world be set aflame. Israel then left the holy places
in the hands of the respective religions; only the western retaining wall of
the Temple Mount is accessible to Jews for prayer, a vestige of the holiest
Jewish site.
In a
world of perfect tolerance, the intricate interactions and overlapping beliefs
of Judaism and Islam, and their reverence for that special space, might be
expected to bring harmony and mutual respect. Instead, more and more
Palestinians deny even the existence of the Jewish Temples in ancient times,
arguing that these are Israeli fabrications to assert possession. Indeed,
conspiracy theories abound that Israel seeks ultimately to destroy the Muslim
shrines there and build a Third Temple.
Notwithstanding the Israeli
government’s consistent denials of any such plan, a small but increasingly
active group of Jews has mobilized to advocate the construction of a Third
Temple. They run a center in the Jewish Quarter containing artifacts to be used
in the forthcoming temple, albeit to be built only when peace reigns. It seems
likely that Trump’s blundering into this morass will only fuel those conspiracy
theories among Muslims, and that the lip service he gave in his speech about
Islam’s attachment to Jerusalem will go unheard by those who now see the United
States as an Israeli collaborator.
No peace negotiations can be
successful without resolving the Jerusalem impasse. While negotiators have
repeatedly kicked Jerusalem down the road and focused instead on boundaries
between Palestinian and Israeli jurisdictions, security arrangements, Jewish
settlements in the West Bank, and other temporal matters, the place supposedly
closest to God continues to seethe.
As the great Israeli poet Yehuda Amichai
wrote in Jerusalem, 1967:
And
already the demons of the past are meeting
with
the demons of the future and negotiating about me
I'm perplexed by the 1995 law requiring the U.S. to move the Embassy to Jerusalem, and the subsequent 6-month waivers signed by the president. And then presidential candidate after presidential candidate runs on the same issue, only to sweep the promise under the rug after taking office. It's all a farce! We get on our high horse, judging other governments for their failings. Is ours any better? Certainly not with Trump at the helm.
ReplyDeleteJerusalem appears to be such an intractable problem. It seems like the only solution is a few more generations of human evolution. However, the latest report about the deal between Sheldon Adelson, the Zionist billionaire casino investor and the Saudis looks promising.
ReplyDeleteAccording to reports on Fox News, both Adelson and the Saudis are looking for new investment opportunities. The plan is to buy the old city of Jerusalem with all its old crappy and run down supposedly sacred sites, bulldoze them down and create an international resort with casinos, golf courses and an ecumenical theme park.
This will bring peace and prosperity to the area, particularly prosperity to the owners of the "Sacred Sites" whose revenues have dropped dramatically since the opening of the Hobby Lobby Bible museum in D.C.
I've really enjoyed your last two blogs, Dave.